Monday, December 8, 2008

A Case for Values-based Core Competencies

In these tough economic times, a company has to stay very competitive in order to survive and hopefully, rising above all challenges in order to ride the next wave of the economic up-cycle. Apart from taking the short-term measures of trimming the fats and reviewing existing business strategies, such a company has to also take actions with a longer-term perspective for future business growth.

One possible measure is to ensure that all remaining employees abide by its stated guiding principles in the course of doing business. These employees also have to strongly demonstrate behavioral actions consistent to stated corporate values at all times. Such desired situation can only come about only if and when a company implements a competency-based management with a bias towards values-based core competencies. Examples of values-based core competencies include among others, competency such as achievement orientation, integrity, ethics and social responsibility, respect for people, valuing diversity, and learning orientation.

A values-based core competency framework provides a competitive edge to the company in the form of a strong values-driven corporate culture. Corporate history has shown that corporations with values-based core competencies outperformed and even outlasted those with strategy-based core competencies. It is obvious that the prerequisite for the determination of a set values-based core competencies is the explicit declaration and subsequent practice of the stated corporate values.

All organizations have corporate values, either implicitly or explicitly stated. These values may include integrity, commitment, team spirit, quality concern, professionalism and accountability. However, more often than not, those espoused corporate values are merely "words-on-the-wall" organization propaganda. This failure of organization failing to live up to its values or what I call the “value practice gap” is mainly caused by the adoption and implementation of a set of corporate values formulated by a team of the senior managers during a facilitated weekend management retreat. I’ve known of a case where the CEO himself presented his preferred set of corporate values for adoption. Such top-down practice may work for formulating corporate strategies but definitely not for corporate values. Many organizational studies have revealed that it is the employees within the organization through their daily behavioral actions and work practices who determined the core values and thus, the corporate culture.

Therefore, it is my belief that the process of determining a values-based core competency framework has to be both participative and culture-specific. An important step is to get the top performing employees from all levels to be involved in identifying the core competencies and the appropriate desired behavioral indicators through a series of focus group discussions or behavioral event interviews.

3 comments:

  1. Hi Khengjoo,

    I agree with you on the need for a values-based competencies. However there are several dilemma.

    Dilemma 1: Clashes of values. Whose value?
    In country like Malaysia, when we talk about values, is it determined along the line of religion. Even though people don't talk about religious values openly, in reality religion plays an important role in employee's life. But these values are often in conflict with each other.

    Dilemma 2: Values cannot be described, it can only be experienced

    Some organization attempt to list their corporate values. Is this a good idea? It is the set of values practiced by individuals that formed the organization core values. Sometime organization put in their website a list of 4 to 5 core values. I think that values are something you experienced.

    Dilemma 3: In the time of danger, very often organizations have no choice but to sacrifice some values

    Organizations lay off staff even their staff have devoted their life for the company!

    In the Romance of 2 Kingdom, Cao Cao's supplies and morale was low. He summoned the supply captain to dilute the rice with water in order to save grain which the soldiers complain. He then beheaded him and announced that the supply captain was selling supplies to the enemy. Seeing such a righteous and justified act, the soldiers redoubled their effort and morale was high again.

    seanang

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Seanang,

    My view on Dilemma #1 is that there's no value conflict irrespective of religion coz I'm referring to the universal human values. Someone once defined an organization as a group of more than 2 persons who decided to come together and work towards a common mission and goal. To me, this means that the group of individuals from different backgrounds with different values have agreed to subscribe to a common set of values irrespective of their differences and thus the formation of organization or corporate values.

    Agreed partly with your point abt values can only be experienced. However, the experienced values become visible in the form of behavioral actions. From a particular behavior of a person,one can quite accurately describe the value being experienced.

    On your point abt the list of corporate values publicly declared by some organizations, I couldn't agree more with you. That's why they have been referred as "words-on-the-wall organization propaganda"!

    Corporate values form the soul and spirit of the organization. When an organization compromised its values for short term gains, it would definitely suffer the long term pain. Where are the Enrons of the world now? The ends don't justify the means!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Btw, what happened to Cao Cao in the end?

    ReplyDelete